Back Testing Results

We would like to begin by noting that we are not strong advocates of backtesting, and here’s why: backtesting can sometimes present misleading information, particularly when conducted on platforms like MT4. Many expert advisor (EA) vendors showcase impressive backtesting results on their websites, yet these often fail to translate into success during live trading. In this context, we will present our own backtesting data, which may appear remarkable at first glance. However, we urge you to approach it with caution. While the results are largely accurate, we must address the ‘Drawdown’ figures in our reports. To be transparent, these figures are not entirely realistic.

That said, our actual drawdown is not as severe as it might seem, and we invite you to review the accompanying performance metrics on our ‘Home Page’, to substantiate our claims. We encourage you to exercise discernment when evaluating claims on other websites, as some may not provide a fully transparent picture.

Upon reviewing the backtesting results, you’ll notice that it indicates a drawdown of 86.75%. However, this figure is clearly inaccurate. For example, the largest recorded loss is only -$15.56, and the combined total losses across 14 trades amount to just -$146.39.

This highlights a common issue with backtesting: the results can often be misleading and are not always a reliable reflection of real-world performance. Additionally, it’s worth noting that some vendors may manipulate backtesting data to present more favorable outcomes.

We are committed to transparency and accuracy in our reporting—it’s unfortunate that the backtest results do not reflect that same standard.